Legal Opinion

Scribner v. National Refining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1932No. 23744. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

Respondent, as plaintiff, sued for the recovery of salary and commissions earned as a salesman. A trial to a jury was had, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,050. From a judgment on the verdict, the defendant has appealed.

The respondent testified in a rather general and vague way to an agreement made the latter part of the year 1928 or early in 1929 by which he was employed as a salesman on a straight salary of one hundred and fifty dollars per month, plus commissions, on oil sold. The purpose of the employment was to introduce and sell in Seattle and vicinity a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stickney v. CongdonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Pylate v. HadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Haefele v. BrackettWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Stuckrath v. SchwarzWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mancini v. City Of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API