Legal Opinion

Jones v. Pendleton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1910No. Docket No. 172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Assumpsit by Clarence R. Jones, administrator de bonis non of the estate of James A. Jones, deceased, against Edward W. Pendleton for commissions on the sale of real estate. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

No general statement of facts or of the history of this case is necessary. Both may be found in the former opinions handed down when it has been before us for consideration. To these decisions reference is had: Jones v. Pendleton, 134 Mich. 460 (96 N. W. 574); Jones v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 141 Mich. 408 (104 N. W. 692); Jones v. Pendleton, 148 Mich. 544 (112 N. W. 1140); Jones v. Pendleton, 151 Mich. 442 (115 N. W. 468). Plaintiff, Jones, died soon after the first trial of the cause in which an issue was joined upon the original dec*339laration. The cause was revived and subsequent proceedings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Jones v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Rogers v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. GearyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API