Jones v. Pendleton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by James A. Jones against Edward W. Pendleton for commissions on the sale of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff sued, in an action of assumpsit, to recover commissions upon a sale of real estate of defendant. The declaration was for money due for commissions payable to the plaintiff for services rendered in and about effecting a sale by the plaintiff, at the request of the defendant, of a certain piece of real estate, etc. The bill of particulars follows the declaration, and is for commissions on sale of real estate. The evidence adduced on the part of plaintiff tended to show that defendant placed the real estate in question in his hands for sale at a price of $35,000; that plaintiff…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. StamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Croze v. St. Mary's Canal Mineral Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.