McAuliffe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of a District Court in a suit on three policies of insurance upon the life of Patrick McAuliffe, deceased, and the propriety of this affirmance is the question before us. We conclude that it was erroneous upon three grounds.
1. The policies, all alike, contained a clause that "no obligation is assumed hv the company prior to the date hereof, nor unless on said date the insured is alive and in sound health;” and it appeared without dispute that on the respective dates of the policies the insured was not…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Panko v. GrimesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Thomas v. New York Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- The COLONIAL LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. MazurNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Kizer v. Life & Casualty Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- Lance v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.