Legal Opinion
State v. Tolisano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 1949PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendant, in a trial to the court, was convicted of maintaining a room with apparatus'1 and devices for the purpose of making, recording or registering bets or wagers in violation of General Statutes, Rev. 1930, § 6280 (Rev. 1949, § 8672) and has appealed. The only substantial question on the appeal relates to rulings on evidence. There was no serious dispute about the facts. The additions to the findings sought by the defendant would not affect the result.
In March, 1947, the defendant was living at 50 Standish Street in Hartford with his wife and two children. At that time he rented two…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Beard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Baum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Commonwealth v. JenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Chacon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.