Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Billingsley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1958No. Crim. 3418PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendants werecharged with violation of section 211, Penal Code (robbery armed with a gun). Defendant Billingsley was also charged with a prior conviction of two counts of larceny. The jury found both guilty of robbery in the first degree and of being armed with a deadly weapon. It also found the prior conviction of defendant Billingsley to be true. Both defendants appeal from the judgment and the order denying new trial.

Questions Presented

1. Sufficiency of evidence of possession of a gun.

2. Did the court order a conviction?

Evidence

About noon February 15, 1957, Robert C. Chenault, a postal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. RauchoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. EspostiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. De FalcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Gravel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API