Legal Opinion

Lindley v. McGlauflin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1910No. 8761PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered January 3, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying the foreclosure of a materialman’s lien. A personal judgment was entered against the defendants J. R. McGlauflin and wife, but the trial court was of the opinion that the right to foreclose the lien was barred, and for that reason denied the foreclosure. The plaintiff appeals from that part of the decree.

It appears that on January 13, 1908, the appellant filed a claim of lien for $1,104.32, for labor and materials furnished in the construction of a house upon certain described real estate, alleging therein that the furnishing of such materials ceased…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. South Missouri Lumber Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. El Reno Electric Light and Telephone Co. v. JennisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Huttig Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Clarke v. HeylmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Sarles v. SharlowSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Labor Discount Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Shope Enterprises, Inc. v. Kent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Airefco, Inc. v. Yelm Community Schools No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. West v. JarviWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Rachow v. Philbrick & NicholsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API