American National Bank of Lake Crystal v. Klist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lides, C.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate an attachment.' The affidavit for attachment specified as the ground thereof “that the said defendant has assigned, secreted or disposed of his property, or is about to do so, with intent to delay or defraud his creditors.” Defendant contends that the affidavit states two distinct grounds for attachment in the alternative and *69that it is bad for that reason. We are of tbe opinion that the contention must be sustained. It is well settled that if the affidavit alleges in the alternative or disjunctive two or more…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Cochran v. ToherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Brown v. Minneapolis Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Blevins v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- First National Bank v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Porter v. BoehmeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Jorgenrud v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969