Legal Opinion

Porter v. Boehme

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1924No. 24,008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order discharging a writ of attachment because of the insufficiency of the affidavit for attachment. In the effort to state the statutory ground this language is used:

“Affiant further states and so verily believes that the defendant is about to depart from the state to avoid service of the summons herein and to defraud and delay his creditor, the plaintiff; that the defendant has or is about to disipóse of his property with intent to defraud his creditor, the plaintiff herein.”

It is urged that the first clause, in this language, down to and including “the plaintiff;”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American National Bank of Lake Crystal v. KlistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Jorgenrud v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API