Legal Opinion
Wickman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 24, 2009No. 07-C-352PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael and Terry Wickman, a married couple, brought this diversity suit' against Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (“State Farm”), alleging that State Farm breached an insurance contract in failing to pay the Wickmans the full amount due under their homeowners policy for a loss caused by a fire, and that it did so in bad faith. Federal jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and the case is presently before the Court on State Farm’s motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fabozzi v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Jacob Lee Enterprises LLC v. Erie Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
- Jewett v. American National Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Pryszmont v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Tafoya v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023