Legal Opinion

Avery v. Avery

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1919No. Civ. No. 2897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts axe stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title to five lots described in the- complaint and situated in Berkeley, Alameda County. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appeals. The defendants answered separately, each claiming a different portion of the land described in the complaint as grantees of Fidelius Avery, deceased. It is conceded that on the twenty-sixth day of May, 1915, title to this land was in Fidelius Avery, the foster father of the plaintiff. Plaintiff claims title thereto as his heir at law, asserting first, that the deeds under which the defendants’ claim as grantees were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Whitney v. TwomblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. In Re Estate of HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lewis v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Blackledge v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Goldman v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Schuler v. SchulerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Larsson v. Cedars of Lebanon HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API