State v. Grimmett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
We must determine (1) whether Grimmett was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; (2) if a seizure occurred, whether a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminality existed at the time of the seizure; (3) whether Grimmett voluntarily consented (a) to accompany the law enforcement officers inside the terminal, and (b) to the search of his belongings; and (4) if Grimmett gave his consent after he was illegally seized, whether the search of his belongings was the tainted product of the illegal seizure and rendered inadmissible the cocaine seized from his person.
Gri…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McDanielsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. PerkerolCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.