Legal Opinion

Fairmont Athletic Club v. Bingham

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

This is an application for an injunction pendente lite. The plaintiff is a corporation duly organized under the Membership Corporations Law of this State. The defendants are all members of the police department of the city of Few York, and this action is brought against them in their individual and official capacity. The plaintiff maintains club rooms at Eos. 251-253 East One Hundred and Thirty-seventh street, in the borough of the Bronx. These rooms are kept open daily and are used by its members for general athletic purposes. Since its incorporation the plaintiff has given weekly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Eden Musee American Co. v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Holland v. . GroteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. HewettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  5. Hale v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slovanian Literary & Social Ass'n v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kent v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Ruty v. HuelsenbeckNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Klinger v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kalwin Business Men's Ass'n v. McLaughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API