Legal Opinion

Ruty v. Huelsenbeck

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 7, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is filed by complainants who leased a dance hall from Dreamland Recreation Club, Incorporated, for a period of ten weeks at a rental of $6,000, which sum has been paid; Dreamland Recreation Club, Incorporated, holding a license from the proper authorities of the city of Newark, dated June 30th, 1931, permitting the holding of dances in the dance hall, which license does not expire until May 23d 1932. The purpose of complainants in making the lease was to hold what is known as a marathon dance. The word "marathon" expresses the nature of the dance. The dance started on October 22d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Brex v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. S. R. Amusement Corp. v. QuinnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Higgins v. KrogmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API