Legal Opinion

Hale v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Joseph Burns, individually, and as ■captain of the second police precinct of the police department of the city of’New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 16th day of July, 1904, continuing a temporary injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, J.:

This is an action against the defendant Burns, individually, and -as captain of the second police precinct of the police department of the city of New York, for injunctive relief decreeing that the defendant be restrained from a continuing trespass on the plaintiff’s property. A motion was made at Special Term for a temporary injunction against the defendant in the tenor of the demand for relief in the complaint, and from an order granting such an injunction pendente lite the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff is duly licensed to conduct a saloon at No. 193 "Washington street in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Mohawk & Hudson Rail Road v. ArtcherNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. Weiss v. HerlihyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Fairmont Athletic Club v. BinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Phelps v. McAdooNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hagan v. McAdooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Levy v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API