Legal Opinion

Mary Free Bed Hospital & Rehabilitation Center v. Insurance Co. of North America

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1983No. Docket 64736PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGribbs, J.

In this case we are presented with an issue similar to that addressed in Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co v Horace Mann Ins Co, 131 Mich App 98; 345 NW2d 658 (1983). In Farm Bureau we decided that the "other insurance” clauses of conflicting insurance policies should be disregarded and liability prorated based on the combined policy limits. See Lamb-Weston, Inc v Oregon Automobile Ins Co, 219 Or 110; 341 P2d 110 (1959). Here, the insurance policies of the self-insured plaintiif, Mary Free Bed Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, and the defendant, Insurance Company of North America (INA), contain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. TIG InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. AMER. NAT. FIRE INS. CO. v. Frankenmuth Mutual Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API