Legal Opinion

Zank v. West Penn Power Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeals, 192 and 193PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The plaintiffs severally appeal from the judgments entered on verdicts for each of them. The action was for personal injuries received by the wife-plaintiff as the result of an automobile collision with the vehicle of the defendant. The appellants’ contention is that the verdicts were grossly inadequate, and that the inadequacy was caused by errors of law at the trial.

The wife-plaintiff pleaded and offered evidence of serious injuries to her bach as a result of which she had a prolonged hospitalization and a loss of earnings of more than $7,000. The. date of the accident was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Brenner v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Becker v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Noreika v. Pennsylvania Indemnity Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Durkin v. Equine Clinics, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API