Legal Opinion
Haith v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 1964No. Civ. A. 34160PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
The limited but important question •presented by this second motion to vacate the petitioner’s sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 is whether the petitioner was deprived of due process of law when the voir dire and selection of the jury were conducted in the absence of the trial judge. This solitary issue was dii’ected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to be considered on the merits in Haith v. United States, 330 F.2d 198, 200 (1964).
The factual background of the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy to violate certain liquor laws and his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Robert L. Strauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Rufus E. Stephens, Alias Steve Ringo, Alias Stephen Ringo Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Charles Hartwell Parrott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Sigfredo Rivera-Sola, A/K/A FreddyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Leroy Haith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- People v. BoulericeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- LaClair v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.