People v. Boulerice
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
After receiving a prison term for his second felony indecent exposure conviction, Alan Mark Boulerice appeals, contending that the jury *468selection provisions of Proposition 115 which prohibit the parties from questioning prospective jurors violate the equal protection clauses of the federal and state Constitutions. He also complains that the trial court erred in allowing inadmissible character evidence, and that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct during closing argument. We disagree and affirm.
1. Facts
On March 20, 1990, over the course of the afternoon,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.