Legal Opinion
In re T.C.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 12, 2007No. Nos. 06-293 & 06-402PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. These consolidated cases arise from two separate family court proceedings involving T.C. In the first, T.C. appeals from the Washington Family Court’s order granting the State’s request for involuntary administration of medication. That order was stayed pending appeal. In the second, the State appeals the family court’s order denying the State’s application for continued treatment, and releasing T.C. from the Vermont State Hospital (VSH). Because we affirm the family court’s denial of the motion for continued treatment, we do not reach the merits of the involuntary medication order.
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jakab v. JakabSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Creed v. ClogstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Scott v. City of NewportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re N.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re T.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007