Legal Opinion
Creed v. Clogston
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 16, 2004No. 02-426PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.
¶ 1. In this appeal, we consider whether a restrictive
covenant prohibiting the installation of “mobile homes, campers or trailers” for residential purposes prevents defendants Francis and Debra Clogston from placing a “manufactured home” on their lot. The trial court found that the mobile home covenant in defendants’ deed reflected an intent to exclude all non-site-built homes from defendants’ neighborhood. The court explained that, regardless of the name given to defendants’ home, it was a “mobile home” within the meaning of the restrictive covenant because it fell within the type of housing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Post & Beam Equities Group, LLC v. Sunne Village Development Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Madkour v. ZoltakSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re T.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.