Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. 89-08-0282 CR; CA A70456PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from his conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. We reverse.

Defendant was found guilty in a jury trial. Before sentencing, he learned that the grand jury that indicted him had only six members and moved to quash the indictment. The court denied the motion.

Seven grand jurors must hear and consider all the evidence presented before a grand jury can return a valid indictment. Or Const, Art VII (amended), § 5(2); Goodwin v. State of Oregon, 116 Or App 279, 840 P2d 1372 (1992). Here, only six grand jurors considered the evidence and returned the indictment against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodwin v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API