Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 1994No. 89-08-0282 CR; CA A70456PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, 117 Or App 168, 843 P2d 960 (1992), in which we reversed defendant’s conviction, because only six grand jurors considered the evidence and returned the indictment against him. We allow the motion, withdraw our opinion and affirm defendant’s conviction.

On August 23, 1989, defendant was charged by an indictment with one count of theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He was arraigned on that charge on September 18, 1989, and the court granted him an additional 14 days to move against or demur to the indictment. Defendant did not challenge the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Goodwin v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. BonebrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API