Legal Opinion

Swensson v. Carlton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1943No. 28862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs, Kenneth Swensson and Peter Swensson, copartners, from a judgment entered on June 11, 1942, after plaintiffs’ motion for new trial had been denied.

Plaintiffs instituted this action against Thomas P. Carlton and wife and A. R. McDonnell, to recover an alleged balance due them for labor performed and materials furnished at the' request of McDonnell, a contractor, in the construction of a dwelling for defendants Carlton. The complaint alleges in substance that, on or about July 10, 1941, at the instance and request of McDonnell, who was the contractor and agent of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Pacific Manufacturing Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Anderson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Trane Co. v. Brown-Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API