Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1959No. 35084PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The issue presented is whether a claim of lien was timely filed.
A contracted with C, the general contractor, to do the tile work on a residence which C was erecting for T.
C received substantial progress payments from T, including payment for the tile work, but made no payments to A.
A stopped work on August 20, 1956, at which time the reasonable value of the material he had furnished was $626.25, and the reasonable value of the labor was $949.
On September 6, 1956, C met with a number of creditors, subcontractors, materialmen, and with T’s architect. C revealed his financial difficulties and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Pacific Manufacturing Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Decatur Bridge Co. v. StandartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
- Swensson v. CarltonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Kendallville Lumber Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gene McVety, Inc. v. Don Grady Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. PenceWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Frank J. Trunk & Son, Inc. v. DeHaanMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Trane Co. v. Brown-Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Henderlong Lumber Co., Inc. v. ZinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.