Legal Opinion
New Again Construction Co. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas Bussell Jones, J.
In 1967 the plaintiff New Again Construction Company entered into a written contract with the City of New York to rehabilitate Litchfield Mansion, a famous architectural landmark building located in Prospect Park, Brooklyn. This action is brought by the company to recover damages for extra work performed on the mansion. The company also claims damages for financial losses sustained when the city failed to co-ordinate the work of plumbing and electrical contractors on the job, in good time.
The parties have waived a jury trial on all issues of law. Both sides have stipulated that, in the event…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Stenton v. . JeromeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People Ex Rel. Wells Newton Co. v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- American Bridge Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Johnson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Branko International, Inc. v. Saudi Arabian AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Herman H. Schwartz, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Middle East Banking Company, Cross-Appellant v. State Street Bank International, and Third-Party Cross-Appellee v. Citibank, N.A. And Saudi American Bank, Al-Khobar, Third-Party DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Perosi Electrical Corp. v. Manshul Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Middle East Banking Co. v. State Street Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.