Legal Opinion
Branko International, Inc. v. Saudi Arabian Airlines
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1989No. 87 Civ. 7406 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Branko International, Inc. (‘'International”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment on its claim for unpaid commissions and pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant Saudi Arabian Airlines (“Saudi”) for accrued interest on unpaid freight charges. Saudi has moved for summary judgment on its counterclaim. For the reasons set forth below, Saudi is granted summary judgment dismissing International’s claim for commissions, and Saudi’s counterclaim for interest is dismissed.
The Parties
Internati…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dahlberg v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Abdulaziz Salem Tamimi, Debtor-In-Possession. Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation, Garnishee-Appellant v. Sharon L. Tamimi, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Emanuel v. BarryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Seramur v. Saudi Arabian AirlinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BernsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Francis S. Denney, Inc. v. I.S. Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.