Legal Opinion
Young v. New Jersey Ins.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided November 11, 1922No. 1053PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
This action for damages to plaintiff’s auto, insured by defendant, a New Jersey corporation, after issue joined and jury waived, is tried to the court on the following “agreed statement of facts”:
“It is hereby agreed by and between the parties to the above-entitled action that the accident occurred in the following manner, to wit: That while plaintiff was driving the said automobile upon the public highway at the rate of approximately 30 miles per hour, and was crossing a coulée, the front axle of the car broke, and thereupon the broken axle and frame of the car was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Rydstrom v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. SolinskyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Fireman's Insurance Co. of Newark v. SaveryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.