Legal Opinion
Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 25, 1992No. 53-88CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this government contract action, plaintiff, Solar Turbines, Inc. (Solar), seeks damages in excess of $10 million for an alleged breach of a cost-reimbursement contract it entered with the United States Department of the Navy (the Navy). The contract in issue involved the design, development, and fabrication of a Rankine Cycle Energy Recovery (RACER) system for possible use on Navy gas-turbine powered ships. As modified, the contract placed a $55 million limitation on government payments for the contract work, but provided that upon reaching that $55 million cap,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walter Dawgie Ski Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Allstates Air Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Coast-To-Coast Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Helix Electric, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.