Legal Opinion

Donald Welch v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2016No. 15-16598PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Once again, we consider facial constitutional challenges to California’s law prohibiting state-licensed mental health providers from engaging in “sexual orientation change efforts” (“SOCE”) with minor patients. The law is known as Senate Bill 1172, or SB 1172, and is codified in California’s Business and Professions Code sections 865, 865.1, and 865.2. Plaintiffs are two state-licensed mental health providers and one aspiring state-licensed mental health provider who seek to engage in SOCE with minor patients. Defendants are the Governor of California and other…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Donald Welch v. Edmund Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Olympus Spa v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  4. Tingley v. FergusonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API