Legal Opinion

City of Painesville v. Lake County Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1978No. 78-248PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues raised by the instant cause are (1) whether the Board of Tax Appeals may determine that it does not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the allocation of a local government fund once the board has already ordered a partial distribution of that fund; and (2) whether a notice of appeal to the board which sets forth the exact amount of money a local subdivision claims to have been under-allocated by the county budget commission but which otherwise is couched in general terms complies with the requirements of B. C. 5747.-55(A)(2).2

*284I.

The right to appeal an allocation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. ParksOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wesleyan University Press, Inc. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lenart v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hall v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Shawnee Township v. Allen County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API