Legal Opinion

Stamm v. Cnty. of Cheyenne

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 11, 2018No. 4:17CV3146PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard G. Kopf, Senior United States District Judge

This matter is before the court on Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Filing Nos. 25, 27), which will be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Also at issue are two motions that were filed by Plaintiffs in response to Defendants' motions: (1) Plaintiffs' unopposed motion to dismiss two counts of the Amended Complaint (Filing No. 33), which will be granted; and (2) Plaintiffs' motion to file evidence under restricted access (Filing No. 39), which will be denied.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, Lisa…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Nelnet, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  2. Abdulkadir v. PetersonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
  3. Ashford v. Douglas CountyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
  4. Bohling v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  5. Haller v. County of Dundy, NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API