Pettinger v. Alpena Cedar Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montmorency; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by John Pettinger against the Alpena Cedar Company for goods and supplies furnished to another on defendant’s credit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
While one James H. Wade was lumbering certain lands in Montmorency county in pursuance of a contract with H. K. Gustin, of Alpena, he purchased his camp supplies from the plaintiff, who kept a general store at Atlanta. In January, 1907, the account had increased to $366.99, at which time plaintiff advised Wade that he could not carry him for a larger amount, and that he would have to make some arrangements about making payment of it. Wade then appealed to Gannon for assistance. Soon after this, Gannon, who had charge of Gustin’s lumbering interests in the woods, came to plaintiff’s store and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michael v. KircherMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Central Wholesale Company v. SefaMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Frank v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Plankinton Packing Co. v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.