Legal Opinion
Esposito v. Larig
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 13, 2016PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order, insofar as appealed from, is modified by providing that the branch of landlord’s cross motion seeking to dismiss tenants’ rent-overcharge counterclaims is granted; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.
Landlord commenced this holdover proceeding alleging that she had terminated tenants’ month-to-month tenancy and that tenants were not rent-stabilized because the apartment had been deregulated by virtue “of high rent vacancy deregulation” {see Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-504.2).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crimmins v. Handler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- 300 West 49th Street Associates v. New York State Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- 615 Nostrand Avenue Corp. v. RoachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- Four Forty-One Holding Corp. v. BloomAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933
- Slacin v. AquafreddaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacob Marion, LLC v. "Doe"Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- Thompson Assets LLC v. RaffeloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018