Legal Opinion
Four Forty-One Holding Corp. v. Bloom
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 26, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
In this summary proceeding for non-payment of rent and to recover judgment for $863.34, the amount claimed to be due, the tenant vacated the premises before the return of the precept and in his answer asserted as a defense “ that in conformity with said notice [precept] the tenant has removed from said premises and is no longer in possession thereof.”
The return does not disclose any trial of the issues, but the justice below, in his opinion (141 Mise. 728), says: “ But a single question is presented for my decision in this proceeding. That question is whether this court has been ousted of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Brown v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Cornwell v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Byrne v. PaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- 615 Nostrand Avenue Corp. v. RoachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
- Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. SchneiderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Sowalsky v. E. F. MacDonald Stamp Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Esposito v. LarigAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.