Legal Opinion

Paulsen v. Hourigan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 1924No. 13369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 1. Error from District Court, Comanche County; A. S- Wells, Judge. Actiin by H. C. Paulsen against J. v E. Hourigan, to recover on two promissory notes. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. In 1918 one Chas. F. Bach was engaged in selling stock for the American Packing Company located in El Reno.

Read the full summary

Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 1. Error from District Court, Comanche County; A. S- Wells, Judge. Actiin by H. C. Paulsen against J. v E. Hourigan, to recover on two promissory notes. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. In 1918 one Chas. F. Bach was engaged in selling stock for the American Packing Company located in El Reno. He sold stock of the company to the defendant, J. E-Hourigan, taking in payment therefor the two notes sued on in this action, each for the sum of $525. It appears that none of the stock was ever issued or delivered to the defendant. As an…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Plaintiff assigns five errors in his petition in error, but all of the assignments are argued under the single proposition that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment based thereon. .

No complaint is made of the instructions of the court so that it must be assumed that the court properly instructed the jury upon all questions of law applicable to the facts in evidence. There was practically no conflict in the evidence as to the fraudulent representations made to the defendant by Bach to induce the execution of the notes sued on in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burns v. VaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Allen v. KenyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Davis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. AkardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. P. Lorillard Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API