Legal Opinion

(PC) Luedtke v. Ciolli

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 23, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00406Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES LUEDTKE, No. 1:20-cv-00406-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING 14 CIOLLI, et al., FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 26) 16 17 Plaintiff James Luedtke is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On February 18, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s motion to void his 20 in forma pauperis status and issued an order for plaintiff to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Polanco v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Madrid v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API