Legal Opinion

Madrid v. Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1999No. Nos. 96-17277, 96-16237PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide, in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Martin v. Radix, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1998, 144 L.Ed.2d 347 (1999), whether the district court correctly applied the Prison Litigation Reform Act in awarding attorney’s fees.

I

This case arose as a prisoner civil-rights class action challenging the conditions of confinement at the Pelican Bay State Prison in California. Plaintiffs-Appellees Madrid and others (“prisoners”) alleged a multitude of constitutional violations, including a pattern and practice of excessive force against them, provision of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Boivin v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Walker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hadix v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Madrid v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API