Arthur Davis v. Kay Bryan and Raymond Lopes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
In this § 1983 action, plaintiff-appellant Arthur Davis alleges that he is entitled, under Connecticut law, to be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of from ten to twenty-five years for each of six consecutive life sentences which he is presently serving. Davis asserts that his due process rights were violated when a state prison official determined that his “minimum sentence” on each count was twenty-five years; he claims that he is entitled to have a judge make this determination.
In an earlier appeal, we reversed an order of the United States District Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stewart v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mead v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012