Legal Opinion

Arthur Davis v. Kay Bryan and Raymond Lopes

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 14, 1989No. 1273, Docket 89-2101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

In this § 1983 action, plaintiff-appellant Arthur Davis alleges that he is entitled, under Connecticut law, to be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of from ten to twenty-five years for each of six consecutive life sentences which he is presently serving. Davis asserts that his due process rights were violated when a state prison official determined that his “minimum sentence” on each count was twenty-five years; he claims that he is entitled to have a judge make this determination.

In an earlier appeal, we reversed an order of the United States District Court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Stewart v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mead v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API