Legal Opinion
Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 14, 2012No. AC 32827PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The petitioner, Arthur J. Davis, appeals following the habeas court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent, the commissioner *460of correction. On appeal, the petitioner argues that the court improperly concluded that he was not entitled to be resentenced in accordance with General Statutes § 53a-35.1 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
To provide context for our discussion of the facts of the present case, we first review the relevant statutes. The petitioner originally was sentenced under General Statutes (Rev. to 1968) § 53-10, which provides, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- McCarthy v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CoteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. MendittoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. KalilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014