Legal Opinion
HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 14, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00334Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 HDT BIO CORP., CASE NO. C22-0334JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, 13 LTD., 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Plaintiff HDT Bio Corp.’s (“HDT”) motion for attorneys’ fees 17 and costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. (Mot. (Dkt. # 89); Am. Mot. 18 (Dkt. # 92-1);1 Reply (Dkt. # 96).) Defendant Emcure Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (“Emcure”) 19 opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 95).) The court has considered the parties’ 20 21 1 The court cites to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.