Legal Opinion
Weems v. Citigroup Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 30, 2009PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
A judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has certified a question to this court in accordance with S.J.C. Rule 1:03, as appearing in 382 Mass. 700 (1981). The question arises in connection with consolidated cases, in which the plaintiffs claim, among other things, that a forfeiture provision in an employee stock plan offered by the defendants to their employees, called the Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP), violates the weekly wage act, G. L. c. 149, §§ 148 et seq. (act).3 One complaint in the underlying action initially was filed in the Superior Court in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Ciardi v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Prozinski v. Northeast Real Estate Services, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cook v. Patient Edu, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Mui v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- McAleer v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. v. MagillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Weiss v. DHL Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.