Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Dairy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2000No. Nos. 99-122 and 99-429PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

R.C. 4123.651 regulates the settlement of workers’ compensation claims by providing for administrative review to protect parties against settlements that are “clearly unfair” or that constitute “gross miscarriage[s] of justice.” *203R.C. 4123.65(D). The statute provides that “[n]o settlement agreed to * * * by a self-insuring employer and the self-insuring employer’s employee shall take effect until thirty days after * * * the self-insuring employer and employee sign the final settlement agreement,” and further provides that “[d]uring the thirty-day period, * * * the employer or employee, for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Middletown v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Mack v. Polson Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. Action Coupling & Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Gibson v. Meadow Gold DairyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Dillard Department Stores v. RyanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. OrwickOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API