Legal Opinion

Walker Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeals, 152, 153, 154, 155 and 157PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

These appeals require a construction of the will of John Walker, deceased, with particular reference to a phrase in the tenth item. That item makes provision for testator’s son, Henry. The phrase reads: “if he survives my wife and me”. Upon the audit of the trustees’ account the auditing judge ruled that the phrase had reference only to the son’s life estate and all other dispositions in the item were effective, even though the son did not survive testator’s widow, the son’s stepmother. The court in banc overruled the auditing judge and decided that the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Britt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Orlosky v. HaskellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Groninger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Mayhew's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Rosengarten EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Greenfield EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Benson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Dowd EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API