Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of Canada
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment for an aircraft manufacturer against a workers’ compensation insurance carrier which paid benefits to an injured passenger. The superior court concluded that the insurer’s statutory subrogated claim is barred by the statute of limitations and it has no right of implied indemnity absent a contractual relationship with the manufacturer. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On October 13, 1978, a Twin Otter aircraft manufactured by DeHavilland Aircraft of Canada, Ltd. (DeHavilland) crashed in Barrow. M.O. Ehredt, d/b/a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Perry v. Pioneer Wholesale Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- Heritage v. Pioneer Brokerage & Sales, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Vertecs Corp. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State Mechanical, Inc. v. Liquid Air, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Ehredt v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of CanadaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Lake v. Construction MacHinery, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1992
- American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. J.T. Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.