Legal Opinion

McComb v. McKay

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1947No. 13517PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, brought this action to enjoin the appellees (who will be referred to as “the McKays”) from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The McKays were charged with having failed (1) to keep proper records as required by § 11(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 211(c), and (2) to pay their employees overtime compensation as provided by § 7(a), 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a). The defense of the McKays was that the employees in suit were employees of the Union…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Daniel K. Burry and Sara Burry v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. McComb v. Southern Weighing & Inspection BureauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. Hudspeth v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API