Legal Opinion
Hudspeth v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1948No. Nos. 13692, 13693PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from judgments of dismissal in actions brought by the plaintiffs (appellants), which were consolidated for trial and tried to the District Court. The actions were brought under § 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e). Each plaintiff asserted, in effect, that at the time of his induction into the armed service of the United States he held a nontemporary position as a Commission Agent in the employ of the defendant (appellee), to which position, upon his honorable discharge from the service, he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Skelly Oil Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- National Garment Co. v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Bettinger v. Northwestern Nat. Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Englert Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.