Goodwin v. Scheerer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Ejectment for certain lands in the city and county of San Francisco. The cause was tried *693by the court without a jury, findings of fact were waived, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was denied, and from this order and the judgment the defendants have appealed.
The evidence offered by the plaintiff showed that his grantors had been in the undisturbed possession and occupancy of different parcels of the land described in the complaint—one of them from April, 1885, and the other from July, 1885, until December, 1890—when the defendant Scheerer took forcible…
2Cited by11 opinions
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gurnsey v. Antelope Creek & Red Bluff Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hill v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Peterson v. BensonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.