Legal Opinion

Guaranty Title & Trust Co. v. Pearlman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1906No. 3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.†

This is a bill to set aside as fraudulent a sale of merchandise, in bulk and out of the ordinary course of business, made to the defendant in June last. On or about March 1, 1905, the bankrupts, M. Burke & Co., leased a store in Pittsburgh for the ostensible purpose of carrying on a furniture and household furnishing business; and representing that they had this in view, and having made a show of means, by opening an account in bank and depositing some $7,390 in cash and notes, they placed a large num-*551her of orders, with various jobbing houses in different parts of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Fixen & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
  2. Boonville Nat. Bank of Boonville v. BlakeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  3. Houseman v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. In re SchromDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
  5. In re National Mercantile AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dempster v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Frost v. Latham & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1910
  4. Adler Goldman Commission Co. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1914
  5. Rivoli Drug Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API