Frost v. Latham & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama
In Equity. Suit by C. E. Frost and William S. Lovell, as receivers of Knight, Yancey & Co., bankrupts, and Joe T. Gibson against Latham & Co. and others. On motion by William S. Lovell, as trustee of said bankrupts, for leave to file supplemental bill.
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
The grounds of objections by the defendants to this motion are, in substance, as follows: (1) That the original plaintiffs were without legal right or capacity to institute or maintain the bill filed by them herein, or to have the relief prayed for. (2) That the original bill herein did not state or show any right or cause of action in the original plaintiffs. (3) That this court has no jurisdiction of the matters and things in said original bill set forth. (4) That there is no privity of title between said trustee and said complainants, and particularly between said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In re BotheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Fourth St. Nat. Bank v. Millbourne Mills Co.'s TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- Pond v. New York National Exch. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Lowenstein v. ReikesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Abrams v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Cook v. Du Pont Cellophane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Maynor v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.